GCC vs Outsourcing vs Shared Services: What’s the Difference?

As enterprises scale and expand across regions, choosing the right delivery model becomes a critical decision. Terms like Global Capability Center (GCC), outsourcing, and shared services are often used interchangeably, even though they represent very different approaches to enterprise delivery. This confusion can lead to misaligned expectations, governance challenges, and long-term operational risk.

Each model serves a distinct purpose. A Global Capability Center operates as an in-house delivery model, outsourcing relies on third-party vendors, and shared services focus on consolidating internal functions. Understanding how these models differ in ownership, control, governance, and cost structure is essential for making the right choice.

This article breaks down GCC vs outsourcing vs shared services in practical terms. It compares how each model works, highlights governance differences, and examines the trade-offs between cost efficiency and control.

To put it simply, a GCC functions similarly to the main office. It supports enterprise global operations. It does this by delivering services, knowledge, and execution from a centralized location. This location is often where talent is available at scale. Additionally, it helps to keep operating costs more efficient.

Key Insights

• GCCs, outsourcing, and shared services differ fundamentally in ownership, governance, and strategic intent, despite often being grouped together.
• Global Capability Centers (GCCs) operate as in-house delivery models. They provide the highest level of control, talent ownership, and knowledge retention, making them suitable for long-term capability building and strategic functions.
• Outsourcing is a third-party delivery model focused on speed and cost efficiency. It works best for well-defined, transactional, or short-term needs but introduces trade-offs in control, governance, and institutional knowledge retention.
• Shared Services Centers balance efficiency and internal control. They are ideal for consolidating standardized, high-volume processes such as finance, HR, and procurement, but are typically less suited for advanced or innovation-led work.
• Governance models vary significantly. GCCs and shared services rely on internal governance and leadership, while outsourcing depends on contracts, SLAs, and vendor performance management.

Understanding the Three Enterprise Delivery Models

Enterprises use different delivery models to manage operations and technology at scale. The three most common enterprise delivery models are the Global Capability Center (GCC), third-party outsourcing, and shared services. Each model addresses a different balance of cost, control, and capability.

A GCC follows an in-house delivery model, where the enterprise owns the center and directly governs teams, processes, and outcomes. Outsourcing relies on external vendors to deliver services through contracts and service-level agreements, making it a third-party outsourcing approach. Shared services are internally owned but focus mainly on consolidating standardized functions into a centralized unit.

These differences go beyond structure. They influence governance, accountability, talent ownership, and long-term flexibility. Understanding these distinctions is essential for making an informed outsourcing comparison and evaluating the right cost vs control trade-off for the enterprise.

The following sections break down each model and then present a clear GCC operating model comparison to help enterprises choose the right approach.

What is a Global Capability Center (GCC)?

A Global Capability Center (GCC) is a company-owned delivery hub set up in another country to run critical business and technology work for the enterprise. It operates as an in-house delivery model, meaning the parent company hires the teams, owns the operations, and sets the governance, security, and quality standards.

Unlike third-party outsourcing, where a vendor delivers work through contracts and SLAs, a GCC functions as a direct extension of the enterprise. The goal is not only to execute tasks, but to build long-term capabilities and retain knowledge inside the organization.

In practice, GCCs may handle centralized business functions like finance operations and HR support, as well as advanced work such as engineering, data analytics, cybersecurity, and digital transformation initiatives. As they mature, many GCCs evolve from support centers into strategic units that help drive innovation and improve enterprise-wide delivery.

What is Outsourcing?

Outsourcing is a delivery model where a company hires an external vendor to perform specific business functions or technology work. In this third-party outsourcing approach, the vendor provides people, processes, and delivery management, and the relationship is typically governed through contracts, service-level agreements (SLAs), and performance metrics.

Unlike a GCC or other in-house delivery model, outsourcing shifts execution responsibility outside the enterprise. This can be useful when an organization needs faster ramp-up, short-term capacity, specialized skills for a limited time, or predictable pricing for clearly defined services.

Outsourcing can cover a wide range of work, from customer support and finance operations to application development, infrastructure management, and cybersecurity services. The key trade-off in any outsourcing comparison is the balance between cost efficiency and control. While outsourcing can reduce hiring and operational overhead, it can also introduce governance complexity, dependency on vendor performance, and challenges around knowledge retention and alignment with internal priorities.

What is a Shared Services Center?

A Shared Services Center (SSC) is an internal unit created to consolidate and deliver standardized business functions for different teams or business units within the same enterprise. Unlike third-party outsourcing, shared services are owned by the company and operate under internal governance. The main purpose is to improve efficiency, consistency, and cost management by centralizing repeatable processes.

Most shared services centers focus on high-volume, process-driven work such as finance operations (accounts payable/receivable), HR administration, payroll support, procurement coordination, and basic IT service management. They usually follow well-defined workflows, service catalogs, and performance targets to ensure uniform delivery across the organization.

In an outsourcing comparison, shared services sit between external outsourcing and a full GCC approach. They are internal, so control is higher than vendor delivery, but they are typically more transactional than a Global Capability Center. While GCCs often expand into specialized capabilities like engineering, analytics, or innovation, shared services are generally designed to run centralized business functions efficiently and predictably.

GCC vs Outsourcing: Key Differences

The key differences between a Global Capability Center (GCC) and outsourcing can be understood across ownership, control, governance, and long-term value.

• Ownership and delivery model: A GCC operates as an in-house delivery model owned by the enterprise, while outsourcing relies on third-party vendors to deliver services.
• Control and governance: GCCs provide direct control over processes, quality standards, security, and intellectual property. Outsourcing is governed through contracts and SLAs, which can limit day-to-day control.
• Talent and knowledge ownership: In a GCC, talent is hired and developed internally, allowing knowledge and expertise to stay within the organization. In outsourcing, talent and institutional knowledge largely reside with the vendor.
• Cost vs control trade-off: Outsourcing often offers lower upfront costs and faster setup. GCCs usually require higher initial investment but deliver greater long-term control and predictability.
• Strategic alignment: GCC teams are closely aligned with enterprise goals and can evolve into strategic capability hubs. Outsourcing is typically best suited for well-defined, transactional, or short-term work.
• Long-term value creation: GCCs focus on sustained capability building and enterprise integration, while outsourcing emphasizes service delivery efficiency and contractual performance.

These differences make GCCs more suitable for enterprises prioritizing control and long-term capability, and outsourcing more appropriate when speed and short-term efficiency are the primary goals.

GCC vs Shared Services: Key Differences

While Global Capability Centers (GCCs) and Shared Services Centers (SSCs) are both internal delivery models, they differ in purpose, scope, and strategic depth.

• Primary objective: A GCC is designed to build long-term capabilities and support strategic outcomes, whereas shared services focus on efficiency and cost control through standardized process consolidation.
• Scope of work: GCCs handle a mix of operational and high-skill functions such as engineering, analytics, cybersecurity, and digital transformation. Shared services typically manage repeatable, transactional processes like finance operations, HR administration, and procurement support.
• Capability depth: GCCs develop specialized domain expertise and often evolve into centers of excellence. Shared services prioritize consistency and volume handling rather than deep capability building.
• Strategic role: GCCs play an active role in enterprise transformation and innovation initiatives. Shared services mainly support day-to-day business operations and internal service delivery.
• Operating model: GCCs follow a flexible operating model that can scale and adapt over time. Shared services operate within tightly defined workflows and service catalogs.
• Governance and measurement: GCC performance is measured on outcomes, quality, and business impact. Shared services are usually measured on efficiency metrics such as cost, turnaround time, and service-level compliance.
• Evolution over time: GCCs are built to evolve with the enterprise and expand into new functions. Shared services tend to remain stable once processes are standardized.

These differences make GCCs better suited for enterprises seeking strategic capability growth, while shared services are ideal for consolidating and managing standardized internal processes efficiently.

Outsourcing vs Shared Services Centers: Key Differences

Outsourcing and Shared Services Centers (SSCs) can both improve efficiency, but they differ significantly in ownership, control, and how delivery is managed.

• Ownership model: Outsourcing is delivered by an external provider through third-party outsourcing arrangements, while shared services are owned and operated internally by the enterprise.
• Control and accountability: Shared services offer higher direct control because teams follow internal leadership, policies, and governance. Outsourcing shifts execution to the vendor, with accountability managed mainly through contracts and SLAs.
• Governance differences: Outsourcing governance is contract-based, focusing on service scope, pricing, SLAs, and escalation processes. Shared services governance is internal, driven by enterprise standards, shared policies, and cross-functional leadership alignment.
• Cost structure: Outsourcing often reduces upfront investment and converts costs into predictable vendor fees. Shared services may require setup investment, but can create long-term savings by consolidating internal teams and reducing duplication.
• Flexibility and scaling: Outsourcing can scale quickly by adding vendor capacity, but changes may require contract updates and renegotiation. Shared services scale through internal hiring and process redesign, which can be slower but offers more long-term stability.
• Talent and knowledge retention: Shared services retain skills and process knowledge within the company. In outsourcing, knowledge may sit with the vendor, creating dependency and potential continuity risks when contracts change.
• Best-fit use cases: Outsourcing works well for well-defined, transactional, or short-term needs where speed matters. Shared services work best for long-term consolidation of standardized internal functions across business units.

These differences help enterprises decide whether they need external vendor delivery for speed and flexibility, or internal consolidation for stronger control and long-term process ownership.

GCC vs Outsourcing vs Shared Services: Side-by-Side Comparison

While all three models support enterprise delivery, they differ significantly in ownership, control, and long-term intent. The table below summarizes the key differences to help enterprises quickly evaluate which model aligns best with their operating and governance needs.

Choosing the Right Model for Your Enterprise

Selecting between a Global Capability Center (GCC), outsourcing, and shared services depends on your enterprise’s scale, priorities, and long-term strategy. There is no one-size-fits-all answer; many organizations even use a mix of models at different stages.

• Choose a GCC when long-term control, capability building, and knowledge retention are critical. This model works best for enterprises with stable demand, global scale, and the intent to build strategic functions such as engineering, analytics, or transformation capabilities in-house.
• Choose outsourcing when speed, flexibility, or short-term capacity matters most. Outsourcing is well suited for clearly defined, transactional work or when rapid ramp-up is required without long-term investment in teams or infrastructure.
• Choose shared services when the goal is to standardize and consolidate internal processes. Shared services are ideal for finance, HR, procurement, and other repeatable functions where efficiency, consistency, and cost optimization are the primary objectives.
• Consider hybrid models if your enterprise has varied needs. Many organizations use shared services for transactional work, outsourcing for niche or temporary requirements, and GCCs for core capabilities that demand control and long-term value.

The right choice ultimately depends on how your enterprise balances cost, control, governance, and growth. Aligning the delivery model with business objectives and future plans is key to building a resilient and scalable operating structure.

Common Myths About Enterprise Delivery Models

Enterprise delivery models such as GCCs, outsourcing, and shared services are often misunderstood. These misconceptions can lead to poor model selection, unrealistic expectations, or underperforming setups.

• Myth: One model is always better than the others
  No single model fits every enterprise or situation. Each model serves a different purpose depending on scale, maturity, and strategic goals.
  
• Myth: GCCs and outsourcing are basically the same
  While both may operate offshore, a Global Capability Center is an in-house delivery model, whereas outsourcing depends on third-party vendors with contract-based governance.
  
• Myth: Outsourcing always costs less
  Outsourcing may reduce upfront costs, but long-term expenses can rise due to vendor dependency, change requests, and governance overhead. Cost should always be evaluated alongside control and flexibility.
  
• Myth: Shared services are outdated
  Shared services remain effective for consolidating standardized internal processes. They continue to deliver strong efficiency and consistency benefits when designed correctly.
  
• Myth: These models cannot coexist
  Many enterprises successfully use all three models together. Hybrid approaches allow organizations to match the right delivery model to each function.
  
• Myth: Location is the most important factor
  While location matters, governance, leadership, process design, and integration with business teams have a far greater impact on success.

Understanding these myths helps enterprises make more informed decisions and design delivery models that align with both current needs and long-term strategy.

Conclusion

Choosing between a Global Capability Center (GCC), outsourcing, and shared services is a strategic decision that shapes how an enterprise operates, scales, and competes over time. Each model offers distinct advantages, but they serve different purposes based on business priorities, risk tolerance, and long-term vision.

GCCs are best suited for organizations seeking control, capability building, and long-term value through an in-house delivery model. Outsourcing works well when speed, flexibility, and short-term efficiency are the primary goals. Shared services provide a reliable way to standardize and optimize repeatable internal processes at scale.

FAQs